RWGFX : RiverPark/Wedgewood Fund Class Retail

RWGFX is a US Stocks Market Large Growth with HIGH fees.

RWGFX

RiverPark/Wedgewood Fund Class Retail

FI Score

24 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

1 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

1 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,019 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RWGFX vs EBNEX

34% FI Score
  • ebnex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Funds Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class F-1

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWGFX vs RSSCX

34% FI Score
  • rsscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Columbia Global Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RWGFX vs EDZ

34% FI Score
  • edz
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare RWGFX vs EEIAX

34% FI Score
  • eeiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWGFX vs EIEAX

34% FI Score
  • eieax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RWGFX vs EMIAX

34% FI Score
  • emiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Invesco Oppenheimer Emerging Markets Innovators Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RWGFX vs EMIRX

34% FI Score
  • emirx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Invesco Oppenheimer Emerging Markets Innovators Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RWGFX vs EMKAX

34% FI Score
  • emkax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWGFX vs PFI

34% FI Score
  • pfi
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Invesco DWA Financial Momentum ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RWGFX vs ESHIX

34% FI Score
  • eshix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Short Duration High Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWGFX vs ESICX

34% FI Score
  • esicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Wells Fargo International Bond Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWGFX vs PGVAX

34% FI Score
  • pgvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

PGIM Government Income Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWGFX vs EVGBX

34% FI Score
  • evgbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Evermore Global Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RWGFX vs PHYMX

34% FI Score
  • phymx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Putnam High Yield Fund Class M

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWGFX vs HFLCX

34% FI Score
  • hflcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Floating Rate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWGFX vs NECLX

34% FI Score
  • neclx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Loomis Sayles Limited Term Government and Agency Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWGFX vs GGSOX

34% FI Score
  • ggsox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Grandeur Peak Global Stalwarts Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RWGFX vs FEUZ

34% FI Score
  • feuz
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RWGFX vs FGUAX

34% FI Score
  • fguax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Federated Government Ultrashort Duration Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare RWGFX vs HGHIX

34% FI Score
  • hghix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

The Hartford Healthcare Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo