RULFX : RBC Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund Class A

RULFX is a Alternative Market Short with MODERATE fees.

RULFX

RBC Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund Class A

FI Score

32 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

1 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

1 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,034 Alternative Short funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RULFX vs KNGLX

25% FI Score
  • knglx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RULFX vs TPLNX

25% FI Score
  • tplnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Timothy Plan Small Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RULFX vs AGIAX

25% FI Score
  • agiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

AB Tax-Managed All Market Income Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RULFX vs NECOX

25% FI Score
  • necox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Natixis Funds Trust II Oakmark Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RULFX vs SHTCX

25% FI Score
  • shtcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RULFX vs HMKCX

25% FI Score
  • hmkcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Hartford Municipal Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RULFX vs MOATX

25% FI Score
  • moatx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Castle Focus Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RULFX vs IMANX

25% FI Score
  • imanx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Iman Fund Class K

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RULFX vs FUSGX

25% FI Score
  • fusgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Federated Fund for U.S. Government Securities Class A shares

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RULFX vs HYBUX

25% FI Score
  • hybux
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Hancock Horizon Burkenroad Small Cap Fund Class D

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RULFX vs MNNCX

25% FI Score
  • mnncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RULFX vs LMSBX

25% FI Score
  • lmsbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Federated Municipal Bond Fund Class B Shares

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RULFX vs DTGRX

25% FI Score
  • dtgrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RULFX vs GCINX

25% FI Score
  • gcinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Green Century MSCI International Index Fund Individual Investor

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RULFX vs GIGAX

25% FI Score
  • gigax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Aberdeen International Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RULFX vs LEND

25% FI Score
  • lend
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Amplify CrowdBureau(R) Peer-to-Peer Lending & Crowdfunding ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RULFX vs SSEMX

25% FI Score
  • ssemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

State Street Defensive Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RULFX vs PCWAX

25% FI Score
  • pcwax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Corporate Bond Fund- Class A

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RULFX vs MHNYX

25% FI Score
  • mhnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Madison High Income Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RULFX vs PDHVX

25% FI Score
  • pdhvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency Fund-Class Z

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo