Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
7 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$RSDIX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- sccpx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Sterling Capital Corporate Fund Institutional shares
Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- shiax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Western Asset Short Duration High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tflix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Transamerica Floating Rate Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- vslax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Senior Loan Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- xslcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Senior Loan Fund Class IC
Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- wsiax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Wells Fargo Strategic Income Fund - Class A
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hfhax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- amapx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Amana Participation Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hfhsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund Class R4
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »