Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$RPHYX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- pelax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- semox
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Semper MBS Total Return Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ssizx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Sierra Tactical Core Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ogucx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pfuax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO International Bond Fund (Unhedged) Class A
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- iobzx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
ICON Flexible Bond Fund Class S
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- phymx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam High Yield Fund Class M
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jemdx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- esicx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Wells Fargo International Bond Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »