Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
6 /10
Market Score
0 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
0 /10
$RODI Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 668 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- drthx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
BNY Mellon Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund Class Z
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- nbstx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund Trust Class
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- wil
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Barclays Women in Leadership ETN
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- amca
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
iShares Russell 1000 Pure U.S. Revenue ETF
Expenses: 0.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- afnax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ptoax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
PIMCO StocksPLUS® Absolute Return Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- nyvbx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Davis New York Venture Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- hcacx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
The Hartford Capital Appreciation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- usgix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
USAA Growth & Income Fund Adviser Shares
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »