Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$RNHIX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- mshdx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust High Yield Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bmhax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BMO High Yield Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tflax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Transamerica Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pglbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam Global Income Trust Class B
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dhocx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Delaware High-Yield Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- eixix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- iixax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Catalyst Insider Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pgycx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pioneer Global High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tphix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Timothy Plan High Yield Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »