Diversification Rating
2 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$RNEM Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,038 International Stocks Emerging Markets funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ryh
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
- sagpx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Principal Strategic Asset Management Conservative Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- sgcax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Wells Fargo California Tax-Free Fund - Class Admin
Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- spvu
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Invesco S&P 500 Enhanced Value ETF
Expenses: 0.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- srwax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
SEI Asset Allocation Trust Market Growth Strategy Fund Class F
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ssgax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
SEI Asset Allocation Trust Aggressive Strategy Fund Class F
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- susyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
SEI Institutional Managed Trust U.S. Managed Volatility Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- stryx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Pioneer Strategic Income Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- tepfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
American Funds Tax-Exempt Preservation Portfolio Class F-1
Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- twwox
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
American Century Intermediate Term Tax-Free Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ubvlx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class L
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- vevfx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Vanguard Explorer Value Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- watix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Western Asset Intermediate Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- jgasx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
JPMorgan Growth Advantage Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- btmsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Baird Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bwbix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Baron WealthBuilder Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- jensx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Jensen Quality Growth Fund Class J
Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- msxax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
MainStay MacKay S&P 500 Index Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »