RLTSX : RiverFront Asset Allocation Aggressive Class Investor II

RLTSX is a Allocation Market Total World with LOW fees.

RLTSX

RiverFront Asset Allocation Aggressive Class Investor II

FI Score

46 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

1 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

1 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,682 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RLTSX vs LOGSX

17% FI Score
  • logsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Live Oak Health Sciences Fund

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RLTSX vs TLGCX

17% FI Score
  • tlgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLTSX vs BXHAX

17% FI Score
  • bxhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Barings U.S. High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RLTSX vs AAEMX

17% FI Score
  • aaemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Alger Emerging Markets Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLTSX vs AFMCX

17% FI Score
  • afmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Acuitas US Microcap Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLTSX vs SAJCX

17% FI Score
  • sajcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

AIG Japan Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLTSX vs CONCX

17% FI Score
  • concx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia U.S. Social Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RLTSX vs HYLD

17% FI Score
  • hyld
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

High Yield ETF

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RLTSX vs RSINX

17% FI Score
  • rsinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Victory RS Investors Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLTSX vs MFMPX

17% FI Score
  • mfmpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Frontier Markets Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 2.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLTSX vs ALGCX

17% FI Score
  • algcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Alger International Focus Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLTSX vs OVECX

17% FI Score
  • ovecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Sterling Capital Mid Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLTSX vs NQCCX

17% FI Score
  • nqccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Nuveen NWQ Large Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLTSX vs PLCHX

17% FI Score
  • plchx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pacific Funds High Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RLTSX vs ORICX

17% FI Score
  • oricx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

North Square Oak Ridge Small Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLTSX vs PFSEX

17% FI Score
  • pfsex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund Class R

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLTSX vs PCTGX

17% FI Score
  • pctgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

PIMCO California Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RLTSX vs GARBX

17% FI Score
  • garbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Guinness Atkinson Renminbi Yuan & Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RLTSX vs ARMZX

17% FI Score
  • armzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare RLTSX vs DFRCX

17% FI Score
  • dfrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

DWS Floating Rate Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo