RLTCX : RiverFront Asset Allocation Aggressive Class C

RLTCX is a Allocation Market Total World with HIGH fees.

RLTCX

RiverFront Asset Allocation Aggressive Class C

FI Score

20 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

1 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

1 /10

Similar Funds

We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RLTCX vs CSRCX

32% FI Score
  • csrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Columbia Global Dividend Opportunity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs DVFAX

32% FI Score
  • dvfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Cohen & Steers Alternative Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs GLVCX

32% FI Score
  • glvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Focus Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs AGLCX

32% FI Score
  • aglcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

American Century Focused Global Growth Fund C Class

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs BGLBX

32% FI Score
  • bglbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

BMO Global Low Volatility Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs GXSCX

32% FI Score
  • gxscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Goldman Sachs Satellite Strategies Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs APPLX

32% FI Score
  • applx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Appleseed Fund Investor Share

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs NGLAX

32% FI Score
  • nglax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Neuberger Berman Global Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs MWOCX

32% FI Score
  • mwocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs PQIZX

32% FI Score
  • pqizx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PIMCO Dividend and Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo