RLSFX : RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund Retail Class

RLSFX is a Alternatives Market Short with HIGH fees.

RLSFX

RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund Retail Class

FI Score

38 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,006 Alternatives Short funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RLSFX vs BGSIX

44% FI Score
  • bgsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs VSCVX

44% FI Score
  • vscvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Victory Integrity Small-Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs WHOSX

44% FI Score
  • whosx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Wasatch-Hoisington U.S. Treasury Fund

Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs ABMIX

44% FI Score
  • abmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

AMG Managers Fairpointe Mid Cap Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs MTLBX

44% FI Score
  • mtlbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MFS Municipal Limited Maturity Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs CCFTX

44% FI Score
  • ccftx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Funds 2035 Target Date Retirement Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs COTFX

44% FI Score
  • cotfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Aquila Tax-Free Fund of Colorado Class A

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs HRLYX

44% FI Score
  • hrlyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs VANTX

44% FI Score
  • vantx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

JPMorgan New York Tax Free Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs PRRJX

44% FI Score
  • prrjx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs PSPAX

44% FI Score
  • pspax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

PIMCO StocksPLUS® Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs CCGTX

44% FI Score
  • ccgtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Funds 2040 Target Date Retirement Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs LGMCX

44% FI Score
  • lgmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Loomis Sayles Global Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs GOF

44% FI Score
  • gof
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs PRJPX

44% FI Score
  • prjpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

T. Rowe Price Japan Fund

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs BAPBX

44% FI Score
  • bapbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Smart Beta Retirement Fund Investor A Shares

Expenses: 0.32% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs PRJCX

44% FI Score
  • prjcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Fund-Class C

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs LBHYX

44% FI Score
  • lbhyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Thrivent High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs PGVFX

44% FI Score
  • pgvfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Polaris Global Value Fund

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs PSI

44% FI Score
  • psi
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Invesco Dynamic Semiconductors ETF

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo