RLSFX : RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund Retail Class

RLSFX is a Alternatives Market Short with HIGH fees.

RLSFX

RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund Retail Class

FI Score

38 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,006 Alternatives Short funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RLSFX vs TWQAX

45% FI Score
  • twqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Transamerica Large Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs EOI

45% FI Score
  • eoi
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Options-based

Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Options-based Other fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs SZNE

45% FI Score
  • szne
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs JACSX

45% FI Score
  • jacsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

JPMorgan SmartRetirement® Blend 2060 Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs JAGTX

45% FI Score
  • jagtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class T

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs JHMF

45% FI Score
  • jhmf
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

John Hancock Multifactor Financials ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs NFLT

45% FI Score
  • nflt
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs NIQTX

45% FI Score
  • niqtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund Trust Class

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs TQMIX

45% FI Score
  • tqmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs NRAAX

45% FI Score
  • nraax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs UBVCX

45% FI Score
  • ubvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs UVALX

45% FI Score
  • uvalx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

USAA Value Fund

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs HILVX

45% FI Score
  • hilvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Harbor Large Cap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs UVABX

45% FI Score
  • uvabx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

USAA Virginia Bond Fund Adviser Shares

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs OGICX

45% FI Score
  • ogicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs JSMCX

45% FI Score
  • jsmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2030 Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs KAUIX

45% FI Score
  • kauix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Federated Kaufmann Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs USCGX

45% FI Score
  • uscgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

USAA Capital Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs VEVCX

45% FI Score
  • vevcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs VMFIX

45% FI Score
  • vmfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Intermediate Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo