RLSFX : RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund Retail Class

RLSFX is a Alternatives Market Short with HIGH fees.

RLSFX

RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund Retail Class

FI Score

38 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,006 Alternatives Short funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RLSFX vs TCVYX

45% FI Score
  • tcvyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Touchstone Mid Cap Value Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs THICX

45% FI Score
  • thicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Thornburg Limited Term Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs TSIAX

45% FI Score
  • tsiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Thornburg Strategic Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs TTAI

45% FI Score
  • ttai
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

TrimTabs All Cap International Free-Cash-Flow ETF

Expenses: 0.61% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs TUR

45% FI Score
  • tur
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

iShares MSCI Turkey ETF

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs TWADX

45% FI Score
  • twadx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

American Century Value Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs TWGGX

45% FI Score
  • twggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

American Century Focused Global Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs TWRCX

45% FI Score
  • twrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

American Century Growth Fund C Class

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs TWUSX

45% FI Score
  • twusx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

American Century Short-Term Government Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs USGIX

45% FI Score
  • usgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

USAA Growth & Income Fund Adviser Shares

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs VGRIX

45% FI Score
  • vgrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

JPMorgan Growth And Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs WARCX

45% FI Score
  • warcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Wells Fargo Absolute Return Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs WEIMX

45% FI Score
  • weimx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs BISIX

45% FI Score
  • bisix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

BlackRock International Dividend Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs JHSOX

45% FI Score
  • jhsox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

John Hancock Funds II New Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs BRUDX

45% FI Score
  • brudx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

MFS Blended Research Value Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs CBLSX

45% FI Score
  • cblsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs CCAPX

45% FI Score
  • ccapx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Chiron Capital Allocation Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs QMOM

45% FI Score
  • qmom
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs CCETX

45% FI Score
  • ccetx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Funds 2030 Target Date Retirement Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo