RLSFX : RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund Retail Class

RLSFX is a Alternatives Market Short with HIGH fees.

RLSFX

RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund Retail Class

FI Score

38 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,006 Alternatives Short funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RLSFX vs GAOCX

46% FI Score
  • gaocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs SPQAX

46% FI Score
  • spqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs OTCNX

46% FI Score
  • otcnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Invesco Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs PCVAX

46% FI Score
  • pcvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

AllianzGI Small-Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs TEFTX

46% FI Score
  • teftx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Templeton Foreign Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs PEQUX

46% FI Score
  • pequx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Putnam Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs JAGLX

46% FI Score
  • jaglx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T

Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs FRBSX

46% FI Score
  • frbsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Franklin Mutual U.S. Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs FGFIX

46% FI Score
  • fgfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Federated Select Total Return Bond Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs GOEX

46% FI Score
  • goex
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Global X Gold Explorers ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs NECZX

46% FI Score
  • neczx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs NFEAX

46% FI Score
  • nfeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Columbia Large Cap Growth Opportunity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs NIQVX

46% FI Score
  • niqvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs TRWCX

46% FI Score
  • trwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Transamerica International Equity C

Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs TSEMX

46% FI Score
  • tsemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets Growth Fund Class Y

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs TWTCX

46% FI Score
  • twtcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

American Century Intermediate Term Tax-Free Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs NYAAX

46% FI Score
  • nyaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

American Funds Tax-Exempt Fund of New York® Class A

Expenses: 0.67% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs NYVBX

46% FI Score
  • nyvbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Davis New York Venture Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs OAYEX

46% FI Score
  • oayex
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Oakmark International Small Cap Fund Class Advisor

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs OGLCX

46% FI Score
  • oglcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo