RIPNX : Royce International Premier Fund Investment Class

RIPNX is a International Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with LOW fees.

RIPNX

Royce International Premier Fund Investment Class

FI Score

49 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

6 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

6 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,760 International Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RIPNX vs CPOAX

48% FI Score
  • cpoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Morgan Stanley Insight Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RIPNX vs GVIP

48% FI Score
  • gvip
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RIPNX vs FFR

48% FI Score
  • ffr
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

First Trust FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Markets Real Estate Index Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RIPNX vs FHARX

48% FI Score
  • fharx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Fidelity Freedom® Blend 2040 Fund

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RIPNX vs FIMSX

48% FI Score
  • fimsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Fidelity® Municipal Income 2025 Fund

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RIPNX vs HMVYX

48% FI Score
  • hmvyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Hartford MidCap Value Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RIPNX vs GDNA

48% FI Score
  • gdna
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Goldman Sachs Human Evolution ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RIPNX vs EQRR

48% FI Score
  • eqrr
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RIPNX vs COIAX

48% FI Score
  • coiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Conservative Income Fund Class F

Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare RIPNX vs ASVIX

48% FI Score
  • asvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

American Century Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RIPNX vs LSDRX

48% FI Score
  • lsdrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Loomis Sayles Intermediate Duration Bond Fund A Class

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RIPNX vs HERO

48% FI Score
  • hero
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

Global X Video Games & Esports ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RIPNX vs JCCIX

48% FI Score
  • jccix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RIPNX vs FSCAX

48% FI Score
  • fscax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RIPNX vs FSMB

48% FI Score
  • fsmb
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RIPNX vs GSBFX

48% FI Score
  • gsbfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RIPNX vs JLKLX

48% FI Score
  • jlklx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RIPNX vs LZHYX

48% FI Score
  • lzhyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Lazard US Corporate Income Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RIPNX vs MACVX

48% FI Score
  • macvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MFS Conservative Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RIPNX vs LTXCX

48% FI Score
  • ltxcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

American Funds Limited Term Tax Exempt Bond Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo