RING : iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

RING is a Sector Equity Market Basic Materials with LOW fees.

RING

iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

FI Score

68 /100

Diversification Rating

10 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

6 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

6 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Basic Materials funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RING vs EAGIX

40% FI Score
  • eagix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Eaton Vance Core Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RING vs EAAAX

40% FI Score
  • eaaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Gabelli Enterprise Mergers and Acquisitions Fund Class AAA

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare RING vs EADIX

40% FI Score
  • eadix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RING vs EMIF

40% FI Score
  • emif
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RING vs CULIX

40% FI Score
  • culix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare RING vs CBBCX

40% FI Score
  • cbbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

AB Relative Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RING vs BCEGX

40% FI Score
  • bcegx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Sterling Capital Equity Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RING vs BPSCX

40% FI Score
  • bpscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Boston Partners Small Cap Value Fund II Investor Class

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RING vs BPIAX

40% FI Score
  • bpiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

BMO Pyrford International Stock Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RING vs CFIAX

40% FI Score
  • cfiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Columbia Flexible Capital Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RING vs BROCX

40% FI Score
  • brocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

BlackRock Advantage International Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RING vs LMSIX

40% FI Score
  • lmsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

QS U.S. Small Capitalization Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RING vs TWAAX

40% FI Score
  • twaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Thrivent International Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RING vs STTRX

40% FI Score
  • sttrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Wells Fargo Target 2020 Fund - Class A

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RING vs DHRAX

40% FI Score
  • dhrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Diamond Hill Core Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RING vs KLDW

40% FI Score
  • kldw
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Knowledge Leaders Developed World ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RING vs CSBCX

40% FI Score
  • csbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Calvert Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RING vs HRLIX

40% FI Score
  • hrlix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RING vs JISAX

40% FI Score
  • jisax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

John Hancock Funds II International Small Company Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RING vs JVGIX

40% FI Score
  • jvgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Janus Henderson Adaptive Global Allocation Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo