RHS : Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF

RHS is a Sector Equity Market Consumer Defensive with MODERATE fees.

RHS

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF

FI Score

63 /100

Diversification Rating

9 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Consumer Defensive funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RHS vs AADR

23% FI Score
  • aadr
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs EZJ

23% FI Score
  • ezj
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs BERCX

23% FI Score
  • bercx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs DALVX

23% FI Score
  • dalvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Dunham Large Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs DHYCX

23% FI Score
  • dhycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BNY Mellon High Yield Municipal Bond Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs GAGVX

23% FI Score
  • gagvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Goldman Sachs Blue Chip Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs EEHIX

23% FI Score
  • eehix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

AXS Alternative Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs CTASX

23% FI Score
  • ctasx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs EMDZX

23% FI Score
  • emdzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund-Class Z

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs BGMAX

23% FI Score
  • bgmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

BMO Mid-Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs AZMCX

23% FI Score
  • azmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

AllianzGI Emerging Markets Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs CCSAX

23% FI Score
  • ccsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs LMYIX

23% FI Score
  • lmyix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BrandywineGLOBAL - Global High Yield Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs LOTCX

23% FI Score
  • lotcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

LoCorr Market Trend Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs LPBIX

23% FI Score
  • lpbix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2025 Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs LPCKX

23% FI Score
  • lpckx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2040 Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs MCNYX

23% FI Score
  • mcnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MFS New York Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs LPCNX

23% FI Score
  • lpcnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2030 Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs GGEAX

23% FI Score
  • ggeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Nationwide Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs LSTIX

23% FI Score
  • lstix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Lazard Global Strategic Equity Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo