RFAP : First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Asia Pacific ETF

RFAP is a International Stocks Market Asia/Pacific Stock with MODERATE fees.

RFAP

First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Asia Pacific ETF

FI Score

25 /100

Diversification Rating

4 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

2 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RFAP vs MSSCX

29% FI Score
  • msscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs MSSMX

29% FI Score
  • mssmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Inception Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs KINAX

29% FI Score
  • kinax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Kinetics Internet Advisor Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs KNPYX

29% FI Score
  • knpyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Kinetics Paradigm Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs IIVLX

29% FI Score
  • iivlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs LFECX

29% FI Score
  • lfecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

MFS Lifetime 2035 Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs MTCBX

29% FI Score
  • mtcbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

MFS Technology Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs MTCCX

29% FI Score
  • mtccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

MFS Technology Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs LTTCX

29% FI Score
  • lttcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs IIXIX

29% FI Score
  • iixix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst Insider Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs WGBFX

29% FI Score
  • wgbfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Wells Fargo WealthBuilder Growth Balanced Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs PCHSX

29% FI Score
  • pchsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Putnam Global Health Care Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs PFRCX

29% FI Score
  • pfrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO International Bond Fund (Unhedged) Class C

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs NCDCX

29% FI Score
  • ncdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs GTALX

29% FI Score
  • gtalx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Goldman Sachs Target Date 2035 Portfolio A Shares

Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs NCRCX

29% FI Score
  • ncrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs GSZCX

29% FI Score
  • gszcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Goldman Sachs Strategic Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs NEJYX

29% FI Score
  • nejyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Natixis Funds Trust I Vaughan Nelson Small Cap Value Fund Class Y

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs NELCX

29% FI Score
  • nelcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Nuveen Equity Long/Short Fund Class C

Expenses: 3.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare RFAP vs NOIEX

29% FI Score
  • noiex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Northern Income Equity Fund

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo