Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$REBCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- mcrdx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Matthews Asia Credit Opportunities Fund Investor Class Shares
Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pgglx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam Global Income Trust Class C
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ecdcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dnhyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Dunham High-Yield Bond Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pgycx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pioneer Global High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fehcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
First Eagle High Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- etabx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eventide Limited-Term Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- eixix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bxhax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Barings U.S. High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »