Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$RDLAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 643 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ectgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Growth 1.1 Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- plxgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Virtus KAR Capital Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ryocx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Rydex NASDAQ-100® Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- alccx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- deucx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Delaware U.S. Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- sdgcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
DWS Capital Growth Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- dwocx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
BNY Mellon Research Growth Fund, Inc. Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- dlqax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- arttx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Artisan Focus Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »