Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$RAPAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- migpx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Advantage Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- apfdx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Artisan Global Discovery Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- nawcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Voya Global High Dividend Low Volatility Fund C
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ehgix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Hexavest Global Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- eweix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Wells Fargo Intrinsic World Equity Fund - Class Admin
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ahacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund C
Expenses: 2.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mvgbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- caxix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mvgcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »