Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
3 /10
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
American Century Focused Global Growth Fund A Class
Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Centerstone Investors Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Ivy Apollo Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Invesco Oppenheimer Global Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Lazard Managed Equity Volatility Portfolio Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
MFS Global Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Columbia Select Global Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Columbia Global Dividend Opportunity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Invesco Oppenheimer Global Focus Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map