QVAL : Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF

QVAL is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Value with LOW fees.

QVAL

Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF

FI Score

50 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,182 US Stocks Mid-Cap Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare QVAL vs CAJAX

19% FI Score
  • cajax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Columbia Contrarian Asia Pacific Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs THCYX

19% FI Score
  • thcyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Transamerica High Yield Muni Class C

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs VNDFX

19% FI Score
  • vndfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Viking Tax-Free Fund for North Dakota Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs MIFIX

19% FI Score
  • mifix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Miller Intermediate Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs PGKZX

19% FI Score
  • pgkzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

PGIM Jennison Technology Fund Class Z

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs IGTCX

19% FI Score
  • igtcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Transamerica Dynamic Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs MSUAX

19% FI Score
  • msuax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Real Estate Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs MSADX

19% FI Score
  • msadx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Strategic Income Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs LPBAX

19% FI Score
  • lpbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2025 Fund Investor A Shares

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs HGDIX

19% FI Score
  • hgdix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AAM/HIMCO Global Enhanced Dividend Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs NTKLX

19% FI Score
  • ntklx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Voya Multi-Manager International Small Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs PKCBX

19% FI Score
  • pkcbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Payden/Kravitz Cash Balance Plan Fund Advisor Class

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs FUSCX

19% FI Score
  • fuscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Federated Fund for U.S. Government Securities Class C shares

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs FWDB

19% FI Score
  • fwdb
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

AdvisorShares FolioBeyond Smart Core Bond ETF

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs OFICX

19% FI Score
  • oficx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Intermediate Bond Factor Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs LPJAX

19% FI Score
  • lpjax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2035 Fund Investor A Shares

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs JOMMX

19% FI Score
  • jommx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

JOHCM Emerging Markets Small Mid Cap Equity Fund Class Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs IEQAX

19% FI Score
  • ieqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

ICON Equity Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs CPIEX

19% FI Score
  • cpiex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Counterpoint Tactical Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs ESIYX

19% FI Score
  • esiyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Wells Fargo International Bond Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo