QVAL : Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF

QVAL is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Value with LOW fees.

QVAL

Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF

FI Score

50 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,182 US Stocks Mid-Cap Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare QVAL vs KARS

22% FI Score
  • kars
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs EEHAX

22% FI Score
  • eehax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

AXS Alternative Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs APGRX

22% FI Score
  • apgrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Yorktown Growth Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs BJBIX

22% FI Score
  • bjbix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Aberdeen Select International Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs GTNDX

22% FI Score
  • gtndx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Low Volatility Equity Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs FLDGX

22% FI Score
  • fldgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs AFGGX

22% FI Score
  • afggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Yorktown Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs GREAX

22% FI Score
  • greax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Goldman Sachs Real Estate Securities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs FLRUX

22% FI Score
  • flrux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Meeder Conservative Allocation Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs FLDOX

22% FI Score
  • fldox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Meeder Moderate Allocation Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs PEMBX

22% FI Score
  • pembx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class B

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs MSMTX

22% FI Score
  • msmtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Morgan Stanley Mortgage Securities Trust Class C

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs RGNCX

22% FI Score
  • rgncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Victory Global Natural Resources Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs MILAX

22% FI Score
  • milax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Mirae Asset Asia Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs RRGCX

22% FI Score
  • rrgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Securities Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs LCTCX

22% FI Score
  • lctcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia Connecticut Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs OCMPX

22% FI Score
  • ocmpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs RAANX

22% FI Score
  • raanx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Altegris/AACA Opportunistic Real Estate Fund N

Expenses: 2.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs MECEX

22% FI Score
  • mecex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MainStay Epoch Capital Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs IVOL

22% FI Score
  • ivol
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility and Inflation Hedge ETF New

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo