QUS : SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF

QUS is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with LOW fees.

QUS

SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF

FI Score

75 /100

Diversification Rating

7 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

9 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare QUS vs DSDAX

39% FI Score
  • dsdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BNY Mellon Tax Sensitive Total Return Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs MAPIX

39% FI Score
  • mapix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific Stock

Matthews Asia Dividend Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs MAPCX

39% FI Score
  • mapcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

BlackRock Asian Dragon Fund,Inc.Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs DGL

39% FI Score
  • dgl
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

Invesco DB Gold Fund

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs PBW

39% FI Score
  • pbw
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs PAEBX

39% FI Score
  • paebx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Growth Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs ITTSX

39% FI Score
  • ittsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Hartford Multi-Asset Income and Growth Fund Class R4

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs PBPAX

39% FI Score
  • pbpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs TAN

39% FI Score
  • tan
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

Invesco Solar ETF

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs PAIIX

39% FI Score
  • paiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • International

PIMCO Global Bond Opportunities Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs PADAX

39% FI Score
  • padax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs DSTIX

39% FI Score
  • dstix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BNY Mellon Short Term Income Fund Class D

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs QGRCX

39% FI Score
  • qgrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs PWS

39% FI Score
  • pws
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacer WealthShield ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs BXDCX

39% FI Score
  • bxdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Barings Active Short Duration Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs SWHCX

39% FI Score
  • swhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Principal Strategic Asset Management Strategic Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs PABBX

39% FI Score
  • pabbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Balanced Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs KMF

39% FI Score
  • kmf
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Master Limited Partnership

Kayne Anderson Midstream/Energy Fund, Inc.

Expenses: 4.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Master Limited Partnership Other fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs OGMNX

39% FI Score
  • ogmnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Invesco Oppenheimer Gold & Special Minerals Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs EDI

39% FI Score
  • edi
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Total Income Fund

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo