QUS : SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF

QUS is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with LOW fees.

QUS

SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF

FI Score

75 /100

Diversification Rating

7 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

9 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare QUS vs JJA

39% FI Score
  • jja
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Series B Bloomberg Agriculture Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs RGHYX

39% FI Score
  • rghyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.57% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs HAHYX

39% FI Score
  • hahyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford High Yield Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs AEDCX

39% FI Score
  • aedcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Invesco European Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs JFFCX

39% FI Score
  • jffcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2055 Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs MSCCX

39% FI Score
  • msccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MainStay MacKay California Tax Free Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs ACMCX

39% FI Score
  • acmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AB Intermediate California Municipal Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs FIHD

39% FI Score
  • fihd
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

UBS AG FI Enhanced Global High Yield ETN

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs BSJR

39% FI Score
  • bsjr
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.42% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs SPEDX

39% FI Score
  • spedx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Alger Dynamic Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs AABCX

39% FI Score
  • aabcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Balanced Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs GYLD

39% FI Score
  • gyld
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs CRARX

39% FI Score
  • crarx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

MainStay CBRE Real Estate Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs SNOIX

39% FI Score
  • snoix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Snow Capital Long/Short Opportunity Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs SOXS

39% FI Score
  • soxs
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs MMDAX

39% FI Score
  • mmdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Madison Moderate Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs MSIOX

39% FI Score
  • msiox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Core Plus Fixed Income Portfolio Class L

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs ASIAX

39% FI Score
  • asiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Invesco Asia Pacific Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs PCTBX

39% FI Score
  • pctbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Putnam California Tax Exempt Income Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs PCDAX

39% FI Score
  • pcdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

PIMCO California Short Duration Municipal Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo