QUS : SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF

QUS is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with LOW fees.

QUS

SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF

FI Score

75 /100

Diversification Rating

7 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

9 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare QUS vs FBMCX

42% FI Score
  • fbmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Franklin Managed Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs FID

42% FI Score
  • fid
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs FJPNX

42% FI Score
  • fjpnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

Fidelity® Japan Fund

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs FLBL

42% FI Score
  • flbl
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs FNGO

42% FI Score
  • fngo
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs FRFZX

42% FI Score
  • frfzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs FRUSX

42% FI Score
  • frusx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

Franklin Utilities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs FSHCX

42% FI Score
  • fshcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Fidelity® Select Health Care Services Portfolio

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs FSTCX

42% FI Score
  • fstcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

Fidelity® Select Telecommunications Portfolio

Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs FTXH

42% FI Score
  • ftxh
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs FXR

42% FI Score
  • fxr
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs GEGCX

42% FI Score
  • gegcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Aberdeen Emerging Markets Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs GERAX

42% FI Score
  • gerax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Insights Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs GMZ

42% FI Score
  • gmz
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Master Limited Partnership

Goldman Sachs MLP Income Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 3.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Master Limited Partnership Other fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs LIDAX

42% FI Score
  • lidax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Lord Abbett International Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs JSACX

42% FI Score
  • jsacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2045 Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs GUDB

42% FI Score
  • gudb
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Sage ESG Intermediate Credit ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs HAFIX

42% FI Score
  • hafix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Hartford AARP Balanced Retirement Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.61% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs HCKCX

42% FI Score
  • hckcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Hartford Checks and Balances Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs HDIVX

42% FI Score
  • hdivx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Janus Henderson Dividend & Income Builder Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo