QUS : SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF

QUS is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with LOW fees.

QUS

SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF

FI Score

75 /100

Diversification Rating

7 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

9 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare QUS vs IVAL

47% FI Score
  • ival
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs URTY

47% FI Score
  • urty
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares UltraPro Russell2000

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs OBBCX

47% FI Score
  • obbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

JPMorgan Mortgage Backed Securities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs POEAX

47% FI Score
  • poeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs BIAZX

47% FI Score
  • biazx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Brown Advisory Mortgage Securities Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs ASHS

47% FI Score
  • ashs
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China-A Shares Small Cap ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs MGRCX

47% FI Score
  • mgrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

MFS International Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs MGRBX

47% FI Score
  • mgrbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

MFS International Growth Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs HSDAX

47% FI Score
  • hsdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Short Duration Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs SKTAX

47% FI Score
  • sktax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

SEI Asset Allocation Trust Core Market Strategy Allocation Fund Class F

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs MGLAX

47% FI Score
  • mglax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

MFS Global Real Estate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs SENYX

47% FI Score
  • senyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

SEI Tax Exempt Trust New York Municipal Bond Fund Class F

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs SEMVX

47% FI Score
  • semvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs SEMMX

47% FI Score
  • semmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Semper MBS Total Return Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs MHCAX

47% FI Score
  • mhcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs ISHAX

47% FI Score
  • ishax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs FESGX

47% FI Score
  • fesgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

First Eagle Global Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs SGG

47% FI Score
  • sgg
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Series B Bloomberg Sugar Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs NWQAX

47% FI Score
  • nwqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Nuveen NWQ Flexible Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QUS vs FTXN

47% FI Score
  • ftxn
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo