• cdofx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• chccx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Mid-Cap Growth

AB Discovery Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• emd
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Western Asset Emerging Markets Debt Fund Inc

Expenses: 2.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• ppqax
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

PIMCO RealPath Blend 2050 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• pcgrx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Mid-Cap Value

Pioneer Mid Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

• cif
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

MFS® Intermediate High Income Fund

Expenses: 2.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• mkhcx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• clflx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Total US Bond Market

AdvisorOne CLS Flexible Income Fund Class N

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

• clmax
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Columbia Mortgage Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• dba
• ETF
• Commodities
• Focused

Invesco DB Agriculture Fund

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »