QDIV : Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF

QDIV is a US Stocks Market Large Value with LOW fees.

QDIV

Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF

FI Score

45 /100

Diversification Rating

1 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

8 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,043 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare QDIV vs NAPIX

28% FI Score
  • napix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Voya Multi-Manager International Small Cap Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QDIV vs CVLOX

28% FI Score
  • cvlox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Calamos Global Growth & Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QDIV vs CVY

28% FI Score
  • cvy
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QDIV vs DRGMX

28% FI Score
  • drgmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

BNY Mellon U.S. Mortgage Fund Class Z

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QDIV vs ECEOX

28% FI Score
  • eceox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Lazard Emerging Markets Core Equity Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QDIV vs ECHIX

28% FI Score
  • echix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QDIV vs PGMCX

28% FI Score
  • pgmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PIMCO Global Core Asset Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QDIV vs EEICX

28% FI Score
  • eeicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QDIV vs RPFCX

28% FI Score
  • rpfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Davis Appreciation & Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QDIV vs RSNRX

28% FI Score
  • rsnrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Victory Global Natural Resources Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QDIV vs EMBIX

28% FI Score
  • embix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Blend Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QDIV vs PEMZX

28% FI Score
  • pemzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QDIV vs PEZ

28% FI Score
  • pez
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QDIV vs PGYBX

28% FI Score
  • pgybx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pioneer Global Multisector Income Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QDIV vs EWV

28% FI Score
  • ewv
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare QDIV vs GSCCX

28% FI Score
  • gsccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare QDIV vs FLICX

28% FI Score
  • flicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

DWS Communications Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QDIV vs FDIV

28% FI Score
  • fdiv
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

First Trust Strategic Income ETF

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QDIV vs HFHAX

28% FI Score
  • hfhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QDIV vs HFHSX

28% FI Score
  • hfhsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund Class R4

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo