Diversification Rating
1 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
8 /10
Market Score
0 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
0 /10
$QDIV Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,043 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- sadax
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Short
Wells Fargo Ultra Short-Term Income Fund - Class A
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »
- pacbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Conservative Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- bdkax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Braddock Multi-Strategy Income Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- pvsbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Putnam Capital Spectrum Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- ragtx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Technology
AllianzGI Technology Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- pvscx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Putnam Capital Spectrum Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- pwjcx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
PGIM Jennison International Opportunities Fund- Class C
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- occix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Invesco Select Risk: Conservative Investor Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- pxq
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF
Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- capbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Federated Capital Income Fund Class B Shares
Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- measx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock
Matthews Emerging Asia Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
- mgdcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
MainStay Moderate Growth Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mgdbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
MainStay Moderate Growth Allocation Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mfiox
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
MFS Strategic Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- mflmx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
BlackRock Short-Term Municipal Fund Investor C Shares
Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- chicx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Credit Suisse Floating Rate High Income Fund C
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dayfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AlphaSimplex Multi-Asset Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mistx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
BNY Mellon Short Term U.S. Government Securities Fund Class Investor
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »