Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
8 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
8 /10
$PYHAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- fhytx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated High Yield Trust Service Shares
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mxfax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MainStay Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- phymx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam High Yield Fund Class M
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pubcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Dynamic Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- giocx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Guggenheim Macro Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ebnex
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Funds Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class F-1
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rpihx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
T. Rowe Price Global High Income Bond Fund
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- eeiax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nsbtx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Neuberger Berman Short Duration Bond Fund Trust Class
Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »