Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$PYELX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- gfrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Goldman Sachs High Yield Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- trecx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund
Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fsahx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Fidelity® Short Duration High Income Fund
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sccpx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Sterling Capital Corporate Fund Institutional shares
Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- minc
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
AdvisorShares Newfleet Multi-Sector Income ETF
Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- xslcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Senior Loan Fund Class IC
Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- emkcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund C Class
Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tflix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Transamerica Floating Rate Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cubax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »