Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$PUBCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- idmix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
iM Dolan McEniry Corporate Bond Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tldax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Thornburg Low Duration Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mggyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Mirova Global Green Bond Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cubax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- xslcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Senior Loan Fund Class IC
Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- wsiax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Wells Fargo Strategic Income Fund - Class A
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- eeicx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ghyyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pioneer Global High Yield Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- amapx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Amana Participation Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »