Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$PUBAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- deecx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Delaware Extended Duration Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gifcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- anflx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Angel Oak Financials Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- flarx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pioneer Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mhoax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MFS Global High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fricx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated Floating Rate Strategic Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- wfshx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Wells Fargo Short-Term Bond Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pdhvx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency Fund-Class Z
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tghnx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
TCW High Yield Bond Fund Class N
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »