PTFAX : PIMCO RAE Fundamental Advantage PLUS Fund Class A

PTFAX is a Alternatives Market Neutral with MODERATE fees.

PTFAX

PIMCO RAE Fundamental Advantage PLUS Fund Class A

FI Score

51 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,115 Alternatives Neutral funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare PTFAX vs VSLAX

29% FI Score
  • vslax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Senior Loan Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PTFAX vs KCIIX

29% FI Score
  • kciix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Knights of Columbus International Equity Fund I Share

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PTFAX vs KBWD

29% FI Score
  • kbwd
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare PTFAX vs WWOCX

29% FI Score
  • wwocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Virtus Vontobel Global Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PTFAX vs WAIOX

29% FI Score
  • waiox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Wasatch International Opportunities Fund® Investor Class

Expenses: 2.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PTFAX vs WAMFX

29% FI Score
  • wamfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Walden Midcap Fund

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PTFAX vs EMVCX

29% FI Score
  • emvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Invesco Oppenheimer Emerging Markets Innovators Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PTFAX vs GTAQX

29% FI Score
  • gtaqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Goldman Sachs Target Date 2045 Portfolio A Shares

Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PTFAX vs EMKCX

29% FI Score
  • emkcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund C Class

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PTFAX vs WEHIX

29% FI Score
  • wehix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Weitz Funds Hickory Fund

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PTFAX vs PJIAX

29% FI Score
  • pjiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

PGIM Jennison Focused Value Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PTFAX vs WFSSX

29% FI Score
  • wfssx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Wells Fargo Intrinsic Small Cap Value Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PTFAX vs WGSCX

29% FI Score
  • wgscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Wells Fargo Government Securities Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PTFAX vs WISNX

29% FI Score
  • wisnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

William Blair International Small Cap Growth Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PTFAX vs JPHCX

29% FI Score
  • jphcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PTFAX vs JOAMX

29% FI Score
  • joamx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

JOHCM Asia Ex-Japan Equity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PTFAX vs JAQIX

29% FI Score
  • jaqix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Janus Henderson Asia Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PTFAX vs XSLCX

29% FI Score
  • xslcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Senior Loan Fund Class IC

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PTFAX vs EDICX

29% FI Score
  • edicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Global Income Builder Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PTFAX vs ECTVX

29% FI Score
  • ectvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo