Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$PSQ Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 11,127 Alternative Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- bgrix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Baron Growth Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- espix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
Wells Fargo Special Small Cap Value Fund - Class Admin
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- htab
- ETF
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- agd
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Aberdeen Global Dynamic Dividend Fund
Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mnwax
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Short
MFS Managed Wealth Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- piafx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Invesco Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mncix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Conservative Term Series Class I
Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mmsix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Praxis Small Cap Index Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- hyszx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Short Duration High Yield Income Fund- Class Z
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hiemx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Virtus Vontobel Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- qint
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- hswtx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
Hartford Schroders International Stock Fund Class R5
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- jrstx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Janus Henderson U.S. Managed Volatility Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- hhhyx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class Y
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- mhhqx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
BlackRock Total Return Fund Investor C2 Shares
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- ugmvx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
USAA Global Managed Volatility Fund Fund Shares
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- paltx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Principal LifeTime Strategic Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- mqlfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MFS Limited Maturity Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »