Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
5 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$PRNYX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 746 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- szmax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
DWS Intermediate Tax-Free Fund - Class A
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gwmex
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
AMG GW&K Municipal Enhanced Yield Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fafjx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Nuveen Limited Term Municipal Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ptaex
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Putnam Tax Exempt Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- vminx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Invesco Municipal Income Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ltxcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
American Funds Limited Term Tax Exempt Bond Fund® Class C
Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- vkmmx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Invesco Municipal Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fsmb
- ETF
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nvhcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Nuveen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class C2
Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »