Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$PRHCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- dnfrx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sasfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
AIG Senior Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rsfcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Victory Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- emdzx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund-Class Z
Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- afmmx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Yorktown Short Term Bond Fund Class L
Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nwjtx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Nationwide Loomis Short Term Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dpfax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Deer Park Total Return Credit Fund Class A
Expenses: 2.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- aflex
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- eshax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Short Duration High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »