PRDGX : T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund

PRDGX is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with MODERATE fees.

PRDGX

T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund

FI Score

73 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

4 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare PRDGX vs CIGAX

34% FI Score
  • cigax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

BlackRock U.S. Government Bond Portfolio Investor A Shares

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs EMIRX

34% FI Score
  • emirx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Invesco Oppenheimer Emerging Markets Innovators Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs SNTKX

34% FI Score
  • sntkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs FITRX

34% FI Score
  • fitrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Delaware Total Return Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs MTKKX

34% FI Score
  • mtkkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2060 Series Class K

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs EMKAX

34% FI Score
  • emkax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs NECLX

34% FI Score
  • neclx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Loomis Sayles Limited Term Government and Agency Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs CHIS

34% FI Score
  • chis
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Global X MSCI China Consumer Staples ETF

Expenses: 0.67% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs PHYMX

34% FI Score
  • phymx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Putnam High Yield Fund Class M

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs LCSAX

34% FI Score
  • lcsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs PGVAX

34% FI Score
  • pgvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

PGIM Government Income Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs MIMAX

34% FI Score
  • mimax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Loomis Sayles Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs CHIH

34% FI Score
  • chih
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Global X MSCI China Health Care ETF

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs MJ

34% FI Score
  • mj
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs CFICX

34% FI Score
  • cficx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Calvert Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs EIEAX

34% FI Score
  • eieax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs CDICX

34% FI Score
  • cdicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Calvert Short Duration Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs FTXG

34% FI Score
  • ftxg
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Defensive

First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs RBGCX

34% FI Score
  • rbgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Columbia Capital Allocation Aggressive Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PRDGX vs NGCCX

34% FI Score
  • ngccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Columbia Greater China Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo