Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$PMDDX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,182 US Stocks Mid-Cap Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- oglcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Oppenheimer Global Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- wsscx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Wells Fargo Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- wcpnx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Weitz Core Plus Income Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.57% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- aznax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
AllianzGI Income & Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- orncx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester High Yield Municipal Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- temrx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- bcbcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio Investor C Shares
Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- bcicx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio Investor C Shares
Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- bficx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
American Funds Inflation Linked Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bgafx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Baron Global Advantage Fund Retail Shares
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pudzx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
PGIM Real Assets Fund- Class Z
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- neflx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Loomis Sayles Limited Term Government and Agency Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bscix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Sterling Capital South Carolina Intermediate Tax Free Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mddcx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. Investor A Shares
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- capfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Federated Capital Income Fund Class F Shares
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- merfx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Neutral
The Merger Fund® Investor Class
Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »
- gdiax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Goldman Sachs Short Duration Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- acerx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Invesco Equity and Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »