Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$PMDAX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,182 US Stocks Mid-Cap Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- tphax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Timothy Plan High Yield Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- himax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Hancock Horizon Mississippi Tax-Free Income Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- szk
- ETF
- Alternative
- Inverse
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
- gagex
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Energy
Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund
Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »
- ujpix
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Leveraged Equities
ProFunds UltraJapan Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »
- tuifx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Toews Unconstrained Income Fund
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pjeax
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Real Estate
PGIM US Real Estate Fund- Class A
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »
- prtbx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Short
Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio Class I
Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »
- ryeix
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Energy
Rydex Energy Fund Class Investor
Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »