PLDSX : Pacific Funds Short Duration Income Fund Advisor Class

PLDSX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with LOW fees.

PLDSX

Pacific Funds Short Duration Income Fund Advisor Class

FI Score

59 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare PLDSX vs THOAX

42% FI Score
  • thoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Thornburg Global Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PLDSX vs TWIEX

42% FI Score
  • twiex
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

American Century International Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PLDSX vs UMBHX

42% FI Score
  • umbhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PLDSX vs VIXM

42% FI Score
  • vixm
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Volatility

ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Volatility Alternative fund. See why »

Compare PLDSX vs VTAIX

42% FI Score
  • vtaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PLDSX vs WFSAX

42% FI Score
  • wfsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PLDSX vs ODICX

42% FI Score
  • odicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Invesco Oppenheimer Discovery Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PLDSX vs BIEAX

42% FI Score
  • bieax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Brandes International Equity Fund A

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PLDSX vs QTENX

42% FI Score
  • qtenx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

AQR TM Emerging Multi-Style Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PLDSX vs BINIX

42% FI Score
  • binix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Baron International Growth Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PLDSX vs CAMOX

42% FI Score
  • camox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Cambiar Opportunity Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PLDSX vs OEUR

42% FI Score
  • oeur
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

O’Shares Europe Quality Dividend ETF

Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PLDSX vs EVOIX

42% FI Score
  • evoix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

Altegris Futures Evolution Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare PLDSX vs CHIC

42% FI Score
  • chic
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PLDSX vs CID

42% FI Score
  • cid
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

VictoryShares International High Div Volatility Wtd ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PLDSX vs PRDCX

42% FI Score
  • prdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Principal Diversified Real Asset Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare PLDSX vs THGCX

42% FI Score
  • thgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Thornburg International Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PLDSX vs PUREX

42% FI Score
  • purex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

PGIM Global Real Estate Fund- Class R2

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare PLDSX vs MSACX

42% FI Score
  • msacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare PLDSX vs PSSCX

42% FI Score
  • psscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

PIMCO StocksPLUS® Short Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo