Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$PIXAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 566 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- cdc
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- higjx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Carillon Eagle Growth & Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- nprtx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- fslvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Fidelity® Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- ihgix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
The Hartford Dividend and Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- mlvix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
BMO Large-Cap Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- dhlax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Diamond Hill Large Cap Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- cape
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Barclays ETN+ Shiller Capet ETN
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- jpivx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
JPMorgan Intrepid Value Fund Class I Shares
Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »