Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
6 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$PIALX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- erbcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- nqgax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Nuveen NWQ Global Equity Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- caeix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jvgtx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Janus Henderson Adaptive Global Allocation Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- clacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AdvisorOne CLS Global Aggressive Equity Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- rsscx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Columbia Global Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- evgbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Evermore Global Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- sghix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Sextant Global High Income Fund
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- awscx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Global Core Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »