Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$PGYCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- vslax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Senior Loan Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ptrbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam Fixed Income Absolute Return Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bxhyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Barings U.S. High Yield Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tldax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Thornburg Low Duration Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- wfhyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Wells Fargo Short-Term High Yield Bond Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cubax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gszcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Goldman Sachs Strategic Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jphcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- idmix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
iM Dolan McEniry Corporate Bond Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »