Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$PGGLX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- dflcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fjsix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Nuveen High Income Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- agsax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
AB Unconstrained Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- eadox
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fhicx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated High-Income Bond Fund Class C Shares
Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ifrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Voya Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mhnyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Madison High Income Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fhycx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated High Yield Trust Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- msypx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust High Yield Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »