Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$PGGLX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- hfhyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- wahyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Western Asset High Yield Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gshax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Goldman Sachs High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hygh
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- amipx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Amana Participation Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- phfnx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO High Yield Spectrum Fund Class I-3
Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- deeax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Delaware Extended Duration Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ostcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bsgax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »