Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$PFSLX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,203 US Stocks Small Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- pmlax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
PIMCO Municipal Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- vffyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Victory INCORE Fund for Income Class Y
Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pttcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
PIMCO Total Return Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- prdax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Principal Diversified Real Asset Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- prmdx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
T. Rowe Price Maryland Short-Term Tax-Free Bond Fund
Expenses: 0.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- prrqx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- rfci
- ETF
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF
Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- rggyx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Victory RS Global Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- rnsix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
RiverNorth Doubleline Strategic Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »