Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$PFLRX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- afrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nsbtx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Neuberger Berman Short Duration Bond Fund Trust Class
Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pmzcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Mortgage Opportunities and Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- phymx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam High Yield Fund Class M
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- esicx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Wells Fargo International Bond Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rldax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Victory INCORE Low Duration Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- emkax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund A Class
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cdicx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Calvert Short Duration Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mxfax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MainStay Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »