Diversification Rating
0 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
4 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$PEJ Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,815 Sector Equity Consumer Cyclicals funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- mchqx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
BlackRock Total Return Fund Investor C1 Shares
Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- nguax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund Class Investor
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- imtm
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
iShares Edge MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- fclkx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Fidelity® Large Cap Stock K6 Fund
Expenses: 0.44% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- artrx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Artisan Global Opportunities Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- rpgex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mvtix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Transamerica Mid Cap Value Opportunities I
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- artix
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
Artisan International Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- fscox
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Fidelity® International Small Cap Opportunities Fund
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- trwax
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
Transamerica International Equity A
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- dbem
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- mvcax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- pdnix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
PIMCO Diversified Income Fund Class I-3
Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- libax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Columbia Total Return Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- lgmax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Loomis Sayles Global Allocation Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- lfeq
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
VanEck Vectors Long/Flat Trend ETF
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- dbmax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- hbaax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Hartford Moderate Allocation Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »